Cleric fights ban on child marriage

Cleric fights ban on child marriage

Saudi girl

A senior Saudi cleric issued a religious ruling to allow fathers to arrange marriages for their daughters "even if they are in the cradle," setting up a confrontation between government reformers and influential conservative clergy, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

Sheik Saleh al Fawzan, one of the country's most important clerics, issued the ruling after the justice ministry said this month that it would act to regulate marriages between prepubescent girls and men in the Islamic kingdom.

"Those who are calling for a minimum age for marriage should fear God and not violate his laws or try to legislate things God did not permit" them to legislate, Sheik Fawzan wrote in a fatwa, or religious decree, which was published on his website.

It is not clear what legal weight Sheik Fawzan's fatwa would have if the Saudi justice ministry proceeded with its plan to outlaw child marriages.

Saudi Arabia's legal system is not codified, but because it is based upon an interpretation of Shariah law, the rulings of senior clerics can be used by individual judges when deciding cases.

The fatwa marked the second time in a year that religious authorities knocked back a government initiative to move forward on social issues involving women.

Last year, King Abdullah bin Abdelaziz al Saud pushed for higher female employment, suggesting that women ought to be allowed to work as supermarket cashiers, only for the job to be ruled off-limits to the gender by the Grand Mufti, the country's highest religious leader.

In the conservative Islamic kingdom, women are not allowed to drive and cannot work, travel abroad or undergo surgery without the permission of a male relative.

There were signs the government may be prepared to contest the issue of child marriage. Saudi media reported that the justice ministry would push ahead with setting a minimum age for marriage, despite the fatwa.

In recent months, a spate of stories about young Saudi girls being forced by their fathers to marry middle-aged men for lavish dowries or other personal gains prompted editorials in local media denouncing the practice and calling for change.

In April, the English-language Arab News reported that a court granted a 12-year-old girl a rare divorce from her 80-year-old husband, who paid her father a dowry of 85,000 Saudi riyals, or $23,000.

The Bride Price

The Bride Price

In many societies, the term "child bride" calls to mind impetuous sweethearts, a ladder cautiously positioned beneath a bedroom window, a silent kiss in the moonlight and a young couple making an anxious getaway to a justice of the peace. But this is not a ready image the world over. In Afghanistan, a child bride is very often just that: a child, even a preteen, her innocence betrothed to someone older, even much, much older.

Rather than a willing union between a man and woman, marriage is frequently a transaction among families, and the younger the bride, the higher the price she may fetch. Girls are valuable workers in a land where survival is scratched from the grudging soil of a half-acre parcel. In her parents' home, a girl can till fields, tend livestock and cook meals. In her husband's home, she is more useful yet. She can have sex and bear children.

Afghanistan is not alone in this predilection toward early wedlock. Globally, the number of child brides is hard to tabulate; they live mostly in places where births, deaths and the human milestones in between go unrecorded. But there are estimates. About 1 in 7 girls in the developing world (excluding China) gets married before her 15th birthday, according to analyses done by the Population Council, an international research group.

In the huge Indian states of Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, the proportion is 36 percent; in Bangladesh, 37 percent; in northwest Nigeria, 48 percent; in the Amhara region of Ethiopia, 50 percent. Tens of millions of girls are having babies before their bodies are mature enough, increasing the likelihood of death from hemorrhaging, obstructed labor and other complications.

Stephanie Sinclair's striking photographs of child brides in Afghanistan remind me of my own travels over remote landscapes during the time of the Taliban, when recurring years of drought had parched the final resources from millions of the destitute. Fathers then were especially keen to convert their daughters into brides. It was a way to deliver the girl from hunger — and a way to at least temporarily ward off famine for the rest of the family. Young boys were sold into bondage with the same painful practicality. Rarely have I seen anything more heartbreaking than the tears of a relinquished child.

The drought has since passed, but the poverty remains, as does the widespread custom of early marriage. Some Afghans readily use their daughters to settle debts and assuage disputes. Polygamy is practiced. A man named Mohammed Fazal, 45, told Sinclair that village elders had urged him to take his second wife, 13-year-old Majabin, in lieu of money owed him by the girl's father. The two men had been gambling at cards while also ingesting opium and hashish.

But the practice of early marriage stems as much from entrenched culture as from financial need. Bridal virginity is a matter of honor. Afghan men want to marry virgins, and parents prefer to yield their daughters before misbehavior or abduction has brought the family shame and made any wedding impossible.

Unfortunately, there are no reliable data about the age of Afghans at marriage. Husbands are not ordinarily old enough to be their wives' fathers or grandfathers, but such February-September couples as those pictured here are hardly rare either. In such marriages, the man is likely to view the age difference as a fair bargain, his years of experience in exchange for her years of fecundity. At the same time, the girl's wishes are customarily disregarded. Her marriage will end her opportunities for schooling and independent work.

On the day she witnessed the engagement party of 11-year-old Ghulam Haider to 40-year-old Faiz Mohammed, Sinclair discreetly took the girl aside. "What are you feeling today?" the photographer asked. "Nothing," the bewildered girl answered. "I do not know this man. What am I supposed to feel?"

Rapist husband of dead Yemeni child bride should die

Rapist husband of dead Yemeni child bride should die: family

Elham Al Ashi died Friday, five days after marrying Abdul Hekmi, 24,

Al Asha, Yemen: The family of a 12-year-old Yemeni girl who died after being sexually violated by her husband a few days into her arranged marriage is demanding his execution.

Elham Assi died last Friday, five days after marrying Abed Al Hikmi, 24, in a case which has again brought into sharp focus the plight of Yemen’s so-called “brides of death”.

The medical report from the main hospital in the Hajja province, north of the capital, said she suffered a deep rupture in the genitals.

“I demand the implementation of Allah’s law. I demand punishment,” the mother of the girl, Nijma Ahmad, told AFP, referring to execution, which is the penalty for murder in the Muslim country.

In the hut village of Al Asha the mother said her daughter had been “fine and full of health” when she got married.

The husband’s family in a neighbouring village told her a few days after the wedding that her daughter “was sick, suffering malaria, and that the spirits have possessed her in the wedding”.

“I responded: Have fear for God. My daughter has no problems,” she added.

The brother of the girl, Abdullah, who had married the sister of Al Hikmi on the same day as part of the traditional custom of Sheghar, or swap marriage, accused his brother-in-law and his family of killing his sister.

“They have killed her: her husband and his family. They tied down my sister and killed her,” he said, standing next to his hut where he lived for less than a week with his bride, who is now back with her family.

His in-laws called back his wife, saying that her mother was ill, after they discovered that his sister was dead, he said.

Al Hikmi later went to the family of his bride telling them that she was ill.

“When we got to her, she was motionless,” her mother said.

The family of Assi is now refusing to take her body out of the hospital’s morgue in Hajja, near Al Asha, around 220km northwest of the capital. They want the husband to be punished.

Al Hikmi meanwhile remains in custody and according to a police report has admitted forcing himself onto his wife when she refused to have sex with him.

In September, a 12-year-old wife died along with her baby during a difficult delivery. “This proves that the law and the state will not be able to protect the young girls from early marriage unless there is an awareness campaign combined with penalties for those who break the law that we demand to be ratified,” lawyer Shaza Nasser told AFP.

A law setting a minimum age for marriage at 17 for women and 18 for men has stirred controversy in Yemen and failed to reach implementation despite passing in parliament after conservative MPs demanded that it be revised.

The lawyer, who in 2008 succeeded in obtaining divorce for Nojud Mohammad Ali, married at the age of eight to a man 20 years her senior, said she will take the case of Al Ashi’s family and “demand execution” for Hekmi.

قصيده الشاعر القطري محمد ابن الذيب العجمي الذي حكم عليه بالسجن المؤبد بسببها Poem bringing qatari poet Mohammed Ajami life sentence

An international human rights group has slammed a Qatari court’s life sentence for the poet Muhammad Ibn al-Dheeb al-Ajami, saying it "violates the right to free expression".
Human Rights Watch said putting Ibn al-Deeb on trial "badly undermined Qatar's efforts to present itself as a free speech haven".
HRW said in a statement that the court’s two-line written judgment on November 29 made no reference to any law that Ibn al-Dheeb is alleged to have broken, although the prosecution claimed during the five-minute hearing that he had called for a revolution in Qatar.
Ibn al-Dheeb was not in court and according to his lawyer the judge prevented him from entering any defence or responding to the prosecution’s claims.
In a January 2011 poem titled Tunisian Jasmine, Ibn al-Dheeb expressed support for the uprising there. He previously had recited poems that included passages disparaging senior members of Qatar’s ruling family.
“Qatar, after all its posturing as a supporter of freedom, turns out to be determined to keep its citizens quiet,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch.
“Ibn al-Dheeb’s alleged mockery of Qatar’s rulers can hardly compare to the mockery this judgment makes of the country’s posture as a regional center for media freedom.”
Ibn al-Dheeb has been in detention since his arrest on November 17. Qatar’s judiciary reportedly charged him two days later with “inciting the overthrow of the ruling regime,” but HRW said it is unclear on what basis the court convicted him.
In June, it was reported that a draft media law approved by the State Cabinet would prohibit publishing or broadcasting information that would “throw relations between the state and the Arab and friendly states into confusion” or “abuse the regime or offend the ruling family or cause serious harm to the national or higher interests of the state".
Violators would face stiff financial penalties of up to QR1m ($275,000).
“Ibn al-Dheeb’s conviction is evidence that Qatar’s rulers regard the country’s constitution and treaty obligations as meaningless words,” Stork said.



طوق الحمامة في الالفة و الالاف : خبر في العشق الطاهر الممنوع

قال العلّامة المجتهد ابن حزم في " طوق الحمامة " ( ص : ٢٦٠-٢٦٤ ) : 

وأما خبر صاحبنا أبي عبد الله محمد بن يحيى بن الحسين التميميّ ؛؛المعروف بابن الطنبيّ :
فإنّه كان ، رحمه الله، كأنّه قد خُلق الحُسْنُ على مثاله ، أو خُلق مِنْ نفْس كلّ مَنْ رءاه ! لم أُشاهد له 
مِثْلاً : حُسْناً ، وجمالاً ، وخُلُقاً ، وعِفّةً ، وتصاوناً ، وأدَباً ، وفَهماً ، وحِلماً ، ووفاءً ، وسؤدداً ، وطهارةً ، وكرماً ، ودماثةً ، وحلاوةً ، ولباقةً ، وإغضاءً ، وعقلاً ، ومروءةً ، وديناً ، ودرايةً ، وحِفظاً 
للقرءان ؛ والحديث ؛ والنحو ؛ واللغة . وشاعراً مُفلقاً ، حَسَن الخطّ ؛ وبليغاً مفنّناً . مع حظّ صالحٍ من الكلام والجدل !!
قال : وكنتُ أنا وهو مُتقاربين في الأسنان . وكنّا أليفين لا نفترق ، وخِدْنين لا يجري الماء بيننا إلاّ صفاءً !!
ثمّ ذكر قصّةَ تغرّبه عنه ، ووصول نعيه إليه ، وأنّ المصعب بن عبد الله الأزدي ، المعروف بابن الفرضي ، سأله عن سبب علّته ؛ وهو قد نحُل ، وخفِيَتْ محاسنُ وجهه بالضَنَى ، فلم يبق إلاّ عين 
جوهرها المخبَر عن صفاتها السالفة ، وصار يكاد أنْ يُطيّره النَفَس ، وقرب من الانحناء ، والشجا 
بادٍ على وجهه ، فقال له :
نعم ! أُخبرك : إنّي كنتُ في باب داري بقديد الشمّاس ؛ في حين دخول عليّ بن حمّود قُرطُبة ،
والجيوشُ واردةٌ من الجهات تتسارب ؛ فرأيتُ في جملتهم فتىً لم أُقَدّرْ أنّ للحُسن صورةً قائمةً ،
حتّى رأيتُه ؛ فغلب على عقلي ، وهام به لُبّي ؛ فسألتُ عنه ؟ فقيل لي : هذا فلان ابن فلان ، من 
سكّان جهة كذا ، ناحيةً قاصيةً عن قُرطُبة بعيدة المأخذ ؛ فيئستُ من رؤيته بعد ذلك . ولعمري يا أبا 
بكر ! لا فارقني حُبّه ؛ أو يوردَني رَمْسي !!

قال ابن حزم : فكان كذلك ؛ وأنا أعرف ذلك الفتى وأدريه ، وقد رأيتُه ؛ لكنّي أضربتُ عن اسمه لأنّه قد مات، والتقى كلاهما عند الله عزّ وجلّ . عفا الله عن الجميع !!!

من شهداء العشاق

الإمام المجتهد ابن حزم، كتاب طوق الحمامة في الألفة ووالالآف، باب الموت : 

وربما تزاید الأمر ورق الطبع وعظم الإشفاق فكان سبباً للموت ومفارقة الدنیا، وقد جاء في الآثار: من عشق فعف فمات فھو شھید. وفي ذلك قطعة، منھا:

فإن أهلك هوى أهلك شهـيدا ً       وإن  تمنن  بقيت  قرير  عـين
روى  هذا  لنـا  قـوم  ثـقـات         ثووا بالصدق عن جرح ومين

ولقد حدثني أبو السرى عمار بن زیاد صاحبنا عمن یثق به، أن الكاتب ابن قزمان امتحن بمحبة أسلم بن عبد العزیز، أخى الحاجب ھاشم بن عبد العزیز. وكان أسلم غایة في الجمال، حتى أضجره لما به وأوقعه في أسباب المنیة. وكان أسلم كثیر الإلمام به والزیارة له ولا علم له بأنه أصل دائه، إلى أن توفي أسفاً ودنفاً.

قال المخبر: فأخبرت أسلم بعد وفاته بسبب علته وموته فتأسف وقال: ھلا أعلمتني؟ فقلت: ولم؟ قال: كنت واالله أزید في صلته وما أكاد أفارقه، فما علي في ذلك ضرر. وكان أسلم ھذا من أھل الأدب البارع والتفنن، مع حظ من الفقه وافر، وذا بصارة في الشعر، وله شعر جید، وله معرفة بالأغاني وتصرفھا، وھو صاحب تألیف في طرائق غناء زریاب وأخباره، وھو دیوان عجیب جدا. وكان أحسن الناس خُلقاً وخَلقا، وھو والد أبي الجعد الذي كان ساكناً بالجانب الغربي من قرطبة.

Islam and alcohol: Tipsy taboo

Tipsy taboo

 

 

IT IS Ramadan, Islam’s holy month of fasting. But even now Suleiman, a Muslim hotel worker in the Turkish town of Antakya, sees no reason not to drink alcohol, widely considered by Muslim believers to be forbidden by the Koran and the Hadith, the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad. “The Koran bans getting drunk, but a beer or two doesn’t hurt,” Suleiman says. “This is a matter between me and Allah.”

Centuries ago many of his co-religionists would have agreed (although not on the need for moderation). Historians believe alcohol originated in the Middle East. Indeed, the word may come from the Arabic al-kohl, eyeliner made by mixing distilled ethanol and antimony salts. Similar substances without the powder soon became popular drinks. Debauched nights in the courts of caliphates were enshrined in the khamriyaat, or odes to wine, by Abu Nuwas, an eighth-century poet.

That has long since changed. Nobody knows exactly when Islamic scholars decided that booze was sinful. In the 1970s political Islam led some countries such as Iran and Pakistan to ban alcohol (see table), although many do not and exceptions are made for non-Muslims. In some countries the punishment for Muslims caught quaffing are severe: 80 lashes in the case of Iran. Things may get more arid yet as Islamist parties from Indonesia to Tunisia moot restrictions on alcohol.

 

 

Prohibition has pushed imbibing behind closed doors, but many Muslims still admit to enjoying a tipple. How many people drink varies, but some put the total at 5% of those identifying themselves as Muslim. The black market for spirits flourishes in Libya. Iranians are adept at producing home brew. And in Pakistan “drinks can be ordered to the door quicker than pizza,” says Sadaqat Ali, who runs Willing Ways, a chain of clinics to treat alcoholics.

Drinking may even be on the rise, reckons Humphrey Serjeantson of IWSR, a London-based market-research firm. Between 2001 and 2011 sales of alcohol in the Middle East, where Muslims dominate, grew by 72%, against a global average of 30%. That rise is unlikely to be accounted for by non-Muslims and foreigners alone.

In some Muslim circles drinking is about status. Secular-minded Beirutis like to boast of Lebanon’s wineries. In the Gulf rich people serve imported spirits to impress their guests. Emulating the rich and famous—as well as coping with stress—accounts for a burgeoning drinking culture in Pakistan, says Dr Ali.

Could Islam become more tolerant of drinking? A handful of scholars permit alcohol as long as it is not made from grapes and dates, because these are specifically mentioned in the Koran. But nobody dares open the debate. “No religious scholar is ready to accept the consequences of a fatwa by now saying that beer, spirits, vodka are halal,” says Anas Aboshady, a scholar at the influential al-Azhar University in Cairo.

What is more, since the scrutiny of Islam in the wake of the September 11th 2001 attacks, piety has risen in some quarters. “For many Muslims, alcohol is a question of identity,” says Sami Zubaida, a sociologist at Birkbeck College in London. “Not drinking has become part of a backlash to decadence in the West, where alcohol is associated with loose living.”

Yet Muslim countries will have to face reality. In June health officials in Iran warned of rising numbers of alcoholics and drink-drivers. Since Dr Ali set up Willing Ways in 1980, he has treated hundreds of the 1m Pakistanis he estimates are alcoholics, including judges, politicians and sportsmen. “Most aren’t keen to seek treatment because drinking is still taboo,” he says. “We need to change that.”

حول شعار تطبيق الشريعة ...

      يتنامى الحديث اليوم عن تطبيق الشريعة الإسلاميّة في البلدان التي شهدت حراكاً سياسيّاً ؛ وتحوّلاتٍ أيدَلِيَّةً ؛ أوصلت الجماعات الإسلاميّة إلى مفاصل السلطة ومواقع القرار !
      ولا يخفى - على أيّ مراقبٍ - الواقع الانقساميّ لتلك الجماعات في تمثيلها للإسلام  ؛ حتّى إنّ مقولة بعض المراقبين بأنّنا أمام إسلاماتٍ متعدّدةٍ ، وليس إسلاماً واحداً ؛ تكاد أن تكون مقولةً حقّةً !!
      قديماً رفع الخوارج شعاراً مقارباً لشعار اليوم ؛ يومها واجهوا عليّاً به قائلين : ( إن الحكم إلاّ لله ) !
      وكان جواب عليّ حاسماً بقوله : " الحكم لله ، وفى الأرض حكّام ، ولكنّهم يقولون : لَا إمارةَ ! ولا بدّ للنّاس من إمارةٍ يعمل فيها المؤمن  ؛ ويستمتع فيها الفاجر والكافر ؛ ويبلغ الله فيها الأجل "

      لقد أوضح عليّ بن أبي طالب - وهو هو - النهجةَ اللآحبةَ في تحديد المفاهيم تحديداً نهائيّاً ؛ 
يُعيدُ وضعَ الهرم على قاعدته !!
      إنّها إذن مشكلة المفاهيم في الفكر السياسيّ الإسلاميّ ؛ كما هي مشكلة المصطلحات في الفقه اللسانيّ العربيّ !!
      وفي شعار اليوم ملمح قويّ الشَبَهِ بشعار الخوارج ! 
      يريدون تطبيق الشريعة !
      لكنْ ؛ عن أيّة شريعة يتكلّمون ؟
      وهل الشريعة هنا مرادفةً للدين ؟
      وما علاقة الشريعة بالفقه وهما بالدين ؟
      وأيُّ المدارس الفقهية يريدون ؟
      وعلى أيّ منهجٍ تأصيليّ سيسيرون ؟
      وهل مصادر الاستمداد هي الأدلّة الإجماليّة الأربعة ؟
      وماذا عن لواحقها ؟
      وهل سيعتمد التفسير أم التأويل ؟
      وهل ستعتمد كلُّ أنواع الدِلالات  ؟ 
      ومن أين ستستقى القواعد الكليّة ؟
      وما هي مبادئ التأصيل ، وطرائق التفريع ؟
      وهل من عوائق زمكانيّة ؟
      وماذا عن النُظُم السياسيّة ؟
      بل ماذا عن مفاهيم المعجم السياسيّ المابعد حداثويّ ؟
      بل ماذا عن مفاهيم الاجتماع والاقتصاد والتاريخ والجغرافيا ؟

      لعلّ التساؤلات لا تنتهي في أسطرٍ قلائلَ ؛ لكن التحدّي كلّ التحدّي في وضوح الأجوبة  وصدقها ؛ من دون مواربةٍ أو مراوغةٍ . ومن دون التذاكي في الأساليب البراغماتيّة ، والألاعيب الدونكيشوتيّة !!
      يجب على رافعي شعار الشرعيّة والشريعة ؛ أن يقدّموا للجمهور كلّ الجمهور ؛ أجوبتهم عن هاتيك التساؤلات المحقّة ؛ تلافياً لمزيدٍ من الشرخ العموديّ في البُنَى المجتمعيّةِ ؛ إذا كانوا صادقين
حقّاً !!
     إنّ التاريخ السياسيّ للدولة الدينيّة  ، أو للدولة التي تعتمد الدين قاعدة بناءٍ ؛ لا يَعِدُ إلاّ بألوانٍ من القمع والقتل والاضطهاد ومصادرة الحريّات !
      إنّ حركة التاريخ لا تُخطئ !!
      فليس غريباً أنْ يستبدل توماسو كامبانيلاّ مدينةَ الشمسِ بمدينةِ الله !
      وليس غريباً أنْ يعترض جلال الدين الروميّ على ترشيح القطب لرئاسة الدنيا !!
      فأيّ نفع للهِ في فردوس أرضيّ ؟
      وأيّ دنيا تقوم على رقدة القطب ؟
      الدنيا تُحكم بالدنيا !!
      والناس في الدنيا على دين ملوكهم وزعمائهم ، لا على دين أوليائهم وأنبيائهم !!

      الدين ظاهرة طبيعية بسيطة ساذجة !
     ويقع الدين على الوسط الذهبيّ بين الاتجاه الموجِب نحو الفلسفة ، وبين الاتجاه السالب نحو الإيديولوجيا !!
     حيث تقف الفلسفة المتعالية في خطابها النُخْبويّ ؛ على الطرف القصيّ المقابل للإيديولوجيا في خطابها الشَعْبويّ !!

      إنّ جعل الشريعة قاعدةً للدنيا ؛ يُحوّل الدين إلى إيديولوجية استلابٍ واغترابٍ ، وضررُ الشرع ممّن ينصره لا بطريقهِ ، أكثرُ من ضرره ممّن يطعن فيه بطريقه !!!

    وإنّ من الواجب الحتميّ على الجماعات الإسلاميّة ، هنا وهناك ، قبل مسارقتها ومسارعتها إلى تغيير" أنظمة الحكم " : أنْ تبين للجميع بياناً شافياً ( المنهج التأصيليّ ) لما هي بصدده من حكم الناس بسيف الشرعيّة والشريعة !!!

    ففي " صحيح مسلم " من حديث سليمان بن بريدة عن أبيه مرفوعاً ؛ وفيه :"وإذا حاصرتَ أهلَ حصنٍ ؛ فأرادوك أنْ تُنزلهم على حكم الله ؛ فلا تُنزلهم على حكم الله ! ولكنْ أنزلهم على حكمكَ ؛ فإنّك لا تدري أتُصيب حكم الله فيهم أم لا " !!

   والمعنى من الحديث المارّ : أن لا يقع اللوم على الشريعة بوصفها أحكام الله ؛ حين يجد الناس أنفسهم في وضع مأساويّ ؛ من جرّاءِ ما أُفرِغ فيها من قوالب ومقالب ، وأقوال رجال وطحالب ؛
يُعبّر عن جميعها بعنوان الشريعة وأحكام الله تعالى !!!

   روى أصحاب السِيَر عن عمر ؛ وقد جلس إليه كاتبه وهو يقول : " هذا ما أَرَى اللهُ أميرَ المؤمنين عمر ! فقال : لا تَقُلْ هكذا ، ولكنْ قُلْ : هذا ما رأى أميرُ المؤمنين عمر بن الخطاب " !!!

    حين لا يبدأ الإسلاميون بتوطئة الأجوبة تأصيلاً وتفريعاً ؛ قبل القبض على السلطة ، والتسلّط على الخلق باسم خالقهم . فإنّ مَثَلَهم حينئذٍ كمَثَلِ عقيل بن عُلَّفة ، حين امتحنه الخليفة عمر بن عبد العزيز في شئٍ من القرآن ؛ فقرأ : ( فمن يعمل مثقال ذرّة شرّاً يره  ومن يعمل مثقال ذرّة خيراً يره ) فقال له عمر : ألمْ أقُلْ لكَ إِنَّكَ لا تُحسن أنْ تقرأ ؛ لأنّ الله تعالى قدّم الخير ، وأنت قدّمتَ الشرّ ؛ فقال عقيل :
                خُذا أنفَ هَرْشَى أو قَفاها فإنّما
                                 كلا جانبيْ هَرْشَى لهنّ طريقُ

    فجعل القوم يضحكون من عجرفته !!!

   ولئلاّ نصير ضُحَكَة بين الأمم ، ونظلّ مختلفين ومكابرين ومتعجرفين ؛ فنغدو جميعاً عَقيلَ بنَ عُلَّفة ، لا نأخذ بتصويبٍ ؛ بل نجاهم ونجاقم في تبرير الخطأ ، وتبريز الخطل !!!
         وإنّها حقّاً لإحدى الكُبر !!!