Darul Uloom Deoband at it again, call Saifeena marriage illegal

Saif- Kareena wedding

The marriage of Bollywood lovebirds Saif Ali Khan and Kareena Kapoor would be incomplete without a religion-related comment from Darul Uloom Deoband even if the couple has taken every care of giving it a legal status.


"The marriage is illegal if Kareena is still a Hindu. Going by the Shariah, we cannot accept that they are husband and wife even if they got their marriage registered with the registrar of marriage", the Sunni seminary has stated. 

Mufti Rashid Qasmi, a member of the seminary, said, "As per the Islamic law, the man and the woman both should be Muslims if they tie the nuptial knot. Otherwise the marriage will be Nazayaz- illegal and un-Islamic to be more precise."

"Although they have declared that she has changed her name from Kareena to Safeena, this was not enough. Conversion from other religion to Islam is a lengthy process and they must follow it to give their marriage acceptability in the community", he further said. 

Maulana Mufti Arif Qasmi of the seminary said, "If you believe in Islam, then you will marry a Muslim girl only. But since Saif has married a Hindu girl, he wouldn't be a believer in Islam. But in this case, he is expected to declare his religious belief."

العاشق غائب عن نفسه مستغرق في ربه

لمولانا غزلية عربية في ( الديوان ) :

يا صغير السن يا رطب البدن 
                  يا قريب العهد من شرب اللبن 

هاشمي الوجه تركي القفا 
             ديلمي الشعر رومي الذقن 

روحه روحي وروحي روحه 
            من رأى روحين عاشا في بدن 

صحّ عند الناس أني عاشق 
            غير أن لم يعرفوا عشقي لمن 

اقطعوا شملي وإن شئتم صلوا
            كلّ شيئ منكمُ عندي حسن
-------------------

و إن قيل : سكران بين الناس و صاح مع الحق

قيل بل لا يعرف شيئاً !

صحّ عن سيدي أحمد الرفاعي أنه كان يقول في حالة الهيام بالمطلق :
أنت أنا !
فأنا من ؟

من نوادر أخبار العشاق في الرسالة القشيرية - اعتذار من أهل المحبة و العشق

وقال يحيى بن معاذ: من نشر المحبة عند غير أهلها فهو في دعواه دعيّ.

وقيل: ادَّعى رجل الاستهلاك في محبة شخص، فقال له الشاب: كيف هذا، وأخي أحسن مني وجهاً وأتمُّ جمالاً؟ فرفع الرجل رأسه يلتفت، وكانا على سطح فالقاه من السطح وقال: هذا أجر من يدعي هواناً وينظر إلى سوانا.

وكان سمنون يقدم المحبة على المعرفة، والأكثرون يقدمون المعرفة على المحبة.

وعند المحققين: المحبة: استهلاك في لذة، والمعرفة: شهود في حيرة، وفناء في هيبة.

اين مكر الله في خطابه أهل الجنة "كلوا و اشربوا هنيئا" ؟ Where is the trickery of God in His address to the people of paradise "Enjoy your food and your drink "

أَفَأَمِنُوا مَكْرَ اللَّهِ فَلا يَأْمَنُ مَكْرَ اللَّهِ إِلَّا الْقَوْمُ الْخَاسِرُونَ

Have they secured themselves from the trickery of God. Only the losers would have settled for such false security. 

فسجد الملائكة كلهم أجمعون إلا إبليس ... Iblis and the curse of proximity

A hundred thousand years of obedience are rewarded with a bridle of His curse ...

نديمي غير منســوب     إلى شيء من الحيـــف

سقاني مثلما يشـــرب     كفعل الضيف بالضيف

فلما دارت الكـــــأس     دعا بالنطع والسيـــف

كذا من يشرب الـراح     مع التنين في الصيـــف

Project management: A sufi perspective based on "The Book of Suffering" by Attar of Nishapur

A sheikh goes with his disciples to procure an urgently needed, expensive millstone. When one of them stumbles and the stone falls to the ground and breaks, the sheikh is ecstatic. The disciples are disgruntled that they have carried the stone over several days for nothing - so why, to crown it all, is the sheikh ecstatic about such misfortune ? By breaking, the sheikh answers, the stone has been saved from constantly turning into circles, saved from its confusion and from wandering about. If it had remained intact, it would have had to keep turning constantly; but now the stone has found peace.

"When I saw that the stone had found peace by breaking, my heart too became soft as a bee-wax; the stone revealed its secret to me." 

Whoever has been taken over by unrest

Will be freed; he needs only break.

Whoever stays confused and restless

Will not find relief for all eternity.

Religious freedom could lead to devil worship ... الحرية الدينية قد تؤدي إلى عبادة الشيطان

Ahram Online - Religious freedom could lead to devil worship: Salafist leader


The latest draft of the constitution does not reflect what was agreed by the Constituent Assembly, Salafist assembly member Yasser Borhamy said Tuesday.

Several articles that had been agreed upon by the assembly, and others that had been suggested for inclusion, had been removed from the latest draft, Borhamy said via a statement on the Salafist Nour Party's Facebook page.

"We will not compromise on several of the removed articles," Borhamy said, especially those relating to rights and freedoms.

He added that rights and freedoms should only be protected under the constitution if they do not "violate society's norms." He did not elaborate on what those norms were.

He said some freedoms should be restricted to prevent other norms from being violated.

Borhamy further complained that freedom of religious belief, which was left unrestricted by the new draft, might lead to "devil worship or apostasy from Islam."

He said Salafists would hold mass demonstrations if Article 2 of the constitution was not changed. Salafists have been pressing hard for 'Islamic Sharia' to be the main source of legislation in Egypt, rather than the 'principles of Islamic Sharia' as currently stated by the article.

"Those who voted for President Morsi only chose him so he would apply Islamic Sharia," he claimed.

The Constituent Assembly published on Wednesday the first official draft of the constitution for public debate.

The Supreme Administrative Court is scheduled to look into appeals against the assembly on Tuesday.

Several lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of the assembly and the mechanism for choosing its members.

The High Constitutional Court already ruled in June against the constitutionality of the People's Assembly (lower house of parliament), which chose the 100 members of the constituent assembly.

Borhamy is a professional surgeon who began his preaching activities in the 1970s. He contributed to the establishment of the Salafist Call in Egypt and is a member of the movement's six-man Trustees Council.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/55732.aspx

Imam bridges a wedding divide

http://www.oxfordtimes.co.uk/news/yourtown/oxford/4423688.Imam_bridges_a_wedding_divide/

MUSLIM women and their Christian fiancés from across Europe are travelling to Oxford to get married because imams in their own countries refuse to perform the ceremonies.

Dr Taj Hargey, chairman of the Muslim Education Centre of Oxford, said he had performed about 36 marriages in the past two years between Muslim women and non-Muslim men.

More imams are happy to marry Muslim men to non-Muslim women.

Couples from Spain, Germany, Sweden, Ireland, France and Norway have all come to Dr Hargey after failing to find someone locally prepared to carry out the service.

Dr Hargey, who believes he is the only imam in the UK who openly performs the mixed marriages, said: “We do it because there is no prohibition in the Koran.Most had spent months looking for an imam, and many found Dr Hargey after contacting American Muslim leaders via the Internet.

“Islam allows Muslim men to marry non-Muslim women and such marriages are common, but I am one of the only people who will do it the other way round.”

He said couples had to sign up to five non-negotiable conditions protecting the woman’s faith, and agree to counselling before he would perform marriages.

Muslim Sana Majeed McMillion, 27, and Christian-born Andrew McMillion, 32, were married by Dr Hargey last night in Abingdon — a 1,500 mile round-trip from their home in Oslo.

“When we talked to Dr Taj we finally met someone who had a different understanding of that.”Mr McMillion, an account manager for an IT company, said: “Generally speaking it seems to be totally accepted for men to marry non-Muslims, but not women.

The pair had a civil wedding in Oslo last July, but wanted a Muslim marriage contract and the blessing of Allah on their union.

Pakistan-born Mrs McMillion, who is expecting the couple’s first child, said her faith was “part and parcel” of who she was and added: “The rights set down in the Islamic contract are very precious. This is something really important to me.”

Dr Hargey said: “We have a social timebomb with Muslim women getting better educated than their male counterparts and becoming lawyers and doctors while the men are taxi drivers — the average woman is not going to find her partner from taxi-driving.”

Dr Hojjat Ramzy, a trustee at the Muslim Iqra School in Oxford and an Islamic registrar, said such marriages were not permitted in Islam.

He said: “It is not allowed under any circumstances for a Christian man to marry a Muslim woman, it is not acceptable.”


Tunisia: Investigate Attacks by Religious Extremists | Human Rights Watch

Tunisia: Investigate Attacks by Religious Extremists | Human Rights Watch

(Tunis) – Tunisian authorities should investigate a series of attacks by religious extremists over the past 10 months and bring those responsible to justice, Human Rights Watch said today.

In a July 11, 2012, letter to the ministers of justice and interior, Human Rights Watch described in detail six incidents in which individuals or groups who appeared to be motivated by an Islamist agenda assaulted people – in most cases artists, intellectuals, and political activists – because of their ideas or dress. Human Rights Watch has received reports of another such attack, by a radical religious group, against the organizers of a festival in August.

“The failure of Tunisian authorities to investigate these attacks entrenches the religious extremists’ impunity and may embolden them to commit more violence,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

The letter to the justice and interior ministers documented the apparent failure of authorities to respond to these assaults. Human Rights Watch asked the ministers whether law enforcement and judicial authorities have responded to the complaints filed by the assault victims and whether any suspects have been charged or brought to trial. Human Rights Watch has received no response to the letter.

The victims in the six cases are: Rajab Magri, a drama teacher and civil society activist, assaulted on October 14, 2011, and again on May 25, 2012, in Le Kef; his nephew Selim Magri, on May 7, 2012, in Le Kef; Jaouhar Ben Mbarek, an activist and organizer for Doustourna, a social network, on April 21, 2012, in Souk Al Ahad; Zeineb Rezgui, a journalist, on May 30, 2012, in Tunis; and Mohamed Ben Tabib, a documentary filmmaker and philosophy professor, on May 25, 2012, in Bizerte.

In all six cases the victims filed complaints at the police stations immediately after the assault, in most cases identifying the attackers. As far as Human Rights Watch has been able to determine, police have not arrested any of the alleged attackers or initiated formal investigations or prosecutions against them.

Tunisian authorities are obliged under international law to investigate and prosecute people who assault others, and provide effective remedies to victims.

In the most recent attack brought to the attention of Human Rights Watch, on August 16, a group of bearded men attacked a festival to commemorate the international day for Jerusalem in Bizerte, a city 40 kilometers north of Tunis, injuring at least three activists.

Khaled Boujemaa, a human rights activist and an organizer of the festival, told Human Rights Watch that he called the chief of police several times that day, first to inform him about threats from people he identified from their beards and clothing as salafists, Muslims who advocate a return to Islam as they believe it was practiced in the days of the Prophet Muhammad. The men ordered the organizers to cancel the festival and accused them of being Shi’a, Muslims who are in the minority in Tunisia.

He called the police again after a large group of bearded men started tearing down the photos and the flags posted for the event. Boujemaa made a third call when about 60 assailants started attacking him and other festival participants. He said the chief assured him that police would take the necessary measures for their safety but that no police were sent to protect the festival and that the police chief observed the attack from afar without intervening. Boujemaa was severely beaten and taken to the hospital.

“The police came to see us in the hospital several hours later and we went on August 21 to the police and identified some of the assailants,” Boujemaa told Human Rights Watch. “After that I saw the individuals we identified leave the police station from the back door. We have not heard since whether the trial will take place and when.”

These attacks have taken place in the past 10 months in various parts of the country by people having similar clothing and appearance, based on the victims’ accounts. The attackers have behaved violently and used weapons such as swords, clubs, and knives to prevent festivals or celebrations and have beaten people, apparently for their ideas, dress, or activity.

“The apparent lack of investigations – never mind prosecutions – can only increase the sense of vulnerability by those who earn the ire of these gangs,” Stork said.