Sarmad's Gems as Compiled by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad

Sarmad's Gems 

إِنِّي لَأَجِدُ رِيحَ يُوسُفَ لَوْلاَ أَن تُفَنِّدُونِ

All those who are elevated by Your love
Are asleep in the fields of martyrdom.
Victory for them in the battle of two worlds
Is won through love,
All soldiers of love achieve martyrdom.

In thy present, I cannot even say:
"I am here!"

The buyer want lover's soul
With love as broker
I nearly sold myself to such a buyer
What a wonderful deal I had!

The Houri displays herself to God's devotee.
This is how love initiates to it's way
The un-initiated ...

It is not the fortune of the faint hearted
To suffer in love.
Suffering is for those
Who walks in the flame of love.

Once smitten, it is easier to fall in love
Like the wick of the lamp
Once lit, it is easier to light again.

What more need one drunk with your love
So long as your glance intoxicates. 

I am sold in the market of love
I know not my buyer, nor my price.

There is no fault with a madman
The fault lies in you -
Love hasn't maddened you yet.

Why do you wonder in the wilderness 
Looking for Him ?
Sit still. If He is Khuda,
He will appear on His Own.

A true lover of God is misled
Both by religion and lack thereof
A moth does not choose 
Between the burning candle,
Whether in the mosque or the temple.

You won't get a light sentence in love
By sustaining a wound or two
With his bow-shaped eyebrows
The archer is poised for you.

When asked to retract his sayings, Sarmad's answered:

An age has passed 
Since Mansur's "Ana Al Haqq"
I am here to give fresh lustre
To the gallows ...

Blood shed for lover's sake 
Is never wasted.

http://www.apnaorg.com/books/english/rubayat-sarmad/rubayat-sarmad.pdf

Sarmad, the Cheerful, Naked Martyr

SARMAD, THE CHEERFUL, NAKED MARTYR

Sharif Graham

When I returned home from a pilgrimage around India recently, my wife and daughter noticed I was wearing a new ring, the stone of a blood-red carnelian. They asked about it, and thus I told them the story of how I came to be wearing it: Sarmad's Tomb

It was perhaps ten years ago that I mentioned to Pir Zia Inayat-Khan my admiration for the Mughal emperor Akbar, and he expressed an even greater admiration for Akbar’s great grandson, Dara Shikoh, about whom I knew very little.

The first son and heir designate of Shah Jehan, Dara was plunged into a war of succession when his father became ill, and was bested in battle by one of his younger brothers, Aurangzeb, an intolerant, narrow-minded man. Dara was a brilliant scholar, and had written a treatise, The Convergence of the Two Oceans, reconciling Vedanta philosophy with Sufism. When he was defeated by Aurangzeb, he fled into the desert with his followers, and continued to wage war against his younger brother until, after another defeat, he was betrayed by a raja with whom he sought refuge, whom he had repeatedly protected against his father’s wrath. On Aurangzeb’s orders, Dara was assassinated.

While reading about Dara Shikoh, I saw several references to a strange figure called Sarmad who had been befriended and introduced into the court by the prince. Sarmad was an Armenian Jew from Iran who had converted to Islam, was an excellent poet, and always went around stark naked. I was intrigued by this odd dervish.

Once Shah Jehan died in 1658, having been held prisoner1 by Aurangzeb for his last years, Aurangzeb had Sarmad arrested and subjected to a judicial review, and eventually ordered him executed by beheading.

I made a point of discovering more about Sarmad on my visit to Delhi. William Dalrymple, easily my favorite writer about India, mentioned in his 1993 book City of Djinns that an enormously fat “descendent” of Sarmad had a lucrative healing practice adjacent to Sarmad’s tomb. I learned that the tomb was just next to the Jama Masjid, the enormous mosque built by Shah Jehan, and I made my way there. But before I relate my experience at the tomb, let me tell you what I found out about Sarmad.

The details of Sarmad’s early life in Iran are sketchy. He is said to have translated the Books of Moses into Farsi (Persian), probably while he was still a Jew. He is also said to have studied philosophy and to have been taught by the great Sufi Mir Findariski. This may be when he accepted Islam.

Sarmad decided to take up a career as a trader. Since Persian paintings were much esteemed in Mughal India, he bought many to take with him to India to trade for jewels, abundant in India and prized in Iran. No doubt he envisioned making many such journeys to ensure his prosperity. It is not exactly clear when he converted to Islam, but he was already a Muslim when he arrived in Mughal territory in what is now Pakistan (Sindh).
   
There, in the port city of Thatta, he is said to have fallen madly in love with a Hindu boy. Here is the account2: “For some days the attraction continued from afar. Eventually the sparks of this fire were fanned by the flames of love and began to blaze, and Abhai Chand moved in with Sarmad. Both the governor of the province and Abhai’s father tried to separate them, but eventually gave in when they saw how pure this love was. Sarmad is said to have taught Abhai all he knew.” Sarmad and Abhai left Sindh and travelled first to the Deccan (southern India) and then Lahore. As a result of his love for Abhai, Sarmad abandoned his ambition as a trader, and in fact lost all interest in social convention, eventually shedding all his clothing, never to wear anything again. He also began to write more very fine poetry in Farsi. What eventually became of his beloved Abhai Chand does not seem to have been recorded.

Dara Shikoh had experienced a miraculous healing in Lahore and thus had become a follower of the Qadiri3 Sufi Mian Mir. It is here that Sarmad encountered the Crown Prince, which resulted in a fast friendship which continued when they went to Delhi, where Dara introduced Sarmad to the court circle. When Dara was later forced to flee with his followers and became a desert wanderer, Sarmad remained in Delhi, having had a vision that his death would occur there. After Dara’s assassination, Sarmad is said to have entered Aurangzeb’s court naked, shouting poetry accusing the new emperor of injustice.

He was arrested and charged with several crimes. The first was going about naked, contrary to the Shari’a. However, the emperor himself intervened, saying that going around naked was not a serious enough offense to merit execution4. Then he was accused of denying the Prophet’s miraj5, as Sarmad had written:

        The mullah6 says that Ahmad7 went to the heavens;
        Sarmad says the heavens were inside Ahmad.

This, however, was ruled ambiguous, and therefore insufficient. The charge that stuck was that he was an atheist, since he said only “La ilaha” (There is no god) without completing the traditional phrase with “illa’llah” (except God). He answered:

        Presently I am drowned in negation;
        I have not yet attained the station of affirmation.
        If I said the whole phrase in this state,
        I would be telling a lie.

This the judges considered blasphemy, and thus sentenced him to be executed.

The next day he was taken to the place of execution, near the Jama Masjid, and when he saw the executioner’s gleaming sword, he smiled, lifted his eyes to heaven, and declared:   

        May I be sacrificed for You.
        Come, come, for in whatever guise
        You come, I recognize You.

Then he said:

        There was a commotion
        and I opened my eyes
        from the dream of non-existence.
        I saw that the night
        of sedition still remained,
        and so I went back to sleep.

He then offered his neck and “drank the goblet of martyrdom.” The year was 1070 A.H. (1660 CE in our calendar). He was buried at the bottom of the steps leading to the East Gate of the Jama Masjid, next to his teacher, Hare Bhare Shah.

According to legend, before he was interred, his severed head uttered the whole kalima (La ilaha illa’llah) several times, indicating that he had attained the station of affirmation, a little too late to save his earthly life. His head is also reported to have said:

        My head was severed from my body
        by that Flirt who was my Companion.
        Otherwise, the headache
        would have been too severe.

From the moment of his death he became known as Sarmad Shahid, literally meaning “the Witness” but in practice meaning “the Martyr.”

On the day I made my way to his tomb, I drank in the atmosphere of the place. It has a feeling of profound peace, punctuated with an impish humor. I thoroughly enjoyed my hour there, often laughing quietly to myself. Around twenty people came and went while I was there, mostly women, but there were two young men together at one point. Everyone was very reverent, and no one was naked. I would have liked to ask them why they came there, but I thought it might be impolite. There were very few visitors compared, say, to Nizamuddin Aulia’s dargah, always crammed. There were no men with notebooks (kadim) trying to get you to promise to send funds, and no one even asked for baksheesh (tips) for looking after your shoes. Clearly, Sarmad is not a commercial opportunity, unlike most of the other Sufi saints of India, and no rules seemed to be in effect (appropriate for an antinomian like Sarmad).

As I left and took some exterior photos, I noticed a little shop. They had a case of rings, and I spied one with a carnelian of appealing color. I tried it on, and it would only fit my little finger. I asked the price, and the man said 250 (about $5), but I looked in my wallet and I only had 150 ($3) left, so I offered that and it was accepted. I wear it on the little finger of my right hand; at first, it turned my flesh black underneath, but that has now stopped.

I hope this little account may ignite some interest in this extraordinary Sufi whom I have come to treasure as a predecessor on the path. For a little humor at the end (Sarmad, despite his tragic story, laughed often and was said to be constantly cheerful), let me pass on a quatrain of Sarmad’s:

Sarmad, intoxicated on love’s glass,
Was propped aloft then dropped upon his ass;
Sober and pious was his only goal,
But now: a drunken heretic—alas.

------

Sharif Graham is a scholar and former professor of Literature and Comparative Religion at University of Arizona and Pima College. For the past twelve years he has authenticated and edited the lectures of Pir-o-Murshid Inayat Khan, and regularly given seminars on Inayat Khan’s teachings. Sharif lives in Suresnes, France.

Votary of Freedom : Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Sarmad

The Sunday Tribune - Books


Votary of freedom
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Sarmad
by V. N. Datta. Rupa. Pages 49. Rs 295.
Kanwalpreet

There is a growing interest among intellectuals to understand the leaders as well as events of the past. Rightly so, for there is a new generation of readers who are ready to accept bare facts put in the right perspective. Historians and other writers are helping by satiating this demand of their readers. This has only led to further search and research.

This book by V. N. Datta is a fine attempt to understand Maulana Abul Kalam Azad who was one of the lofty political personalities involved actively in India’s struggle for freedom. The Maulana was a Muslim who decided not to take up his father’s profession of a pir, was secular in his outlook and felt stifled by Muslim orthodoxy. He was a firm votary of freedom of thought and expression of which this essay is an appropriate example.

This essay by Maulana Abul Kalam at a young age of 23 on Sarmad reflected Maulana’s liberal and bold outlook. His choice to deliberate and write on a poet who did not succumb to unreasonable pressure from Mullahs reflects a lot of Maulana’s personality. Sarmad, a poet and scholar, was close to Dara Shikoh, the heir presumptive to Emperor Shahjahan. Dara Shikoh and Sarmad shared common interest for spiritual quest and believed in oneness of religion. Maulana tried to highlight the extraordinary intellect and humanistic outlook of Dara Shikoh through his essay. He focuses on the heir apparent of the Mughal state never once losing trace of Sarmad. The latter was beheaded by Aurangzeb because he did not conform to the usual religious doctrinal propositions. For Sarmad, "a temple and mosque were symbols and expressions of the same reality, God, in which notions of faith and unbelief are extinguished for ever."

Sarmad, according to Azad, was trying to grasp the Supreme Reality, the Divine Bliss that could make life better. Sarmad was a Sufi who tried to learn from his own experiences and was meditating and learning. These experiments did not go well with the orthodox Muslims who blamed him for religious heresy. What complicated Sarmad’s case was that he was a close associate of Dara Shikoh who held radical views that went against, "the power-hungry, self-righteous jurists backed by the wilful despotism of the Mughal state, headed by Emperor Aurangzeb." Dara Shikoh believed that the Upanishads, too, proclaimed the unity of Being as the Quran did.
Datta analyses Maulana’s essay and tries to bring forth the influences and the hidden aspects of the leader. Maulana, like Sarmad, believed that, "love is the power that moves and sustains the universe; it is that which human soul realises its union with the ultimate reality, fulfilling thereby life’s purpose."

Maulana Azad, the author suspects, faced rejection in love as Sarmad had faced. So, he identifies Sarmad’s life with his own, a tale of sorrow in which love was the guiding light and no sacrifice was too great. Azad adds, "Sarmad’s crime was that he drank the cup in public, while others drank in private." Besides this, Azad was influenced by Sarmad’s pluralistic approach to humanity and his spirit of toleration and co-existence. Sarmad was beheaded because he refused to recite the full Kalima. Azad defends Sarmad for not doing so because Sarmad till then had not seen or experienced what he was told to recite.

The essay is laced with verses written by Sarmad. The English translation helps the reader understand the crux of the poet understanding of life. This essay traces the growth of Azad’s religious and political thought. V. N. Datta, Emeritus Professor of Modern History, Kurukshetra University, and a prolific writer has done full justice to his subject. Sarmad is elusive because there is lack of material about him, yet Datta manages to give us a lucid detail of not only Sarmad but also the life and thoughts of Maulana Azad.

A short but crisp book, which gives a better understanding of the times and life of luminaries of their time—Dara Shikoh, Sarmad and Maulana Azad.


Hazrat Sarmad Shaheed: The Naked Sufi Martyr - Mentor of Dara Shikoh - Beheaded by the orthodoxy spitefulness of Aurangzeb

Hazrat Sarmad Shaheed: The Naked Sufi Martyr 

Translated from the Urdu book Tazkira-ye Awliya-e-Pak o Hind: Khum-khanah-ye Tassawuf [Memoirs of the Saints of India and Pakistan: the tavern of Sufism] by Dr. Zahurul Hasan Sharib

Bismillah ar-Rahman ar-Rahim

Sarmad the Martyr was unique in his age and the saint of his time.

Sher Khan Lodhi is of the opinion that, “his origin was foreign and he was Armenian” He was from an Iranian ; some scholars are of the opinion that he was originally a Christian whereas others think he was Jewish.

His homeland was Kashan ; there was a large Armenian community in Iran of which some were Christian and some Jewish. He accepted . He is famous as Sarmad although in some books he is referred to as Sarmad the Cheerful (Saeedaaye Sarmad).

From his Letters and Quatrains it is apparent that he was very learned in the traditional Islamic sciences. He had great command over the Persian and also knew Arabic. Professionally, he was a trader.

A turning point in his life

In those days Persian works of were greatly valued in and one could get a good price for them. Thus, Sarmad gathered some works of and set off for . He intended to sell these works of in and buy precious gems with the money and then sell these gems in Persia. In those days travellers went to via Sindh and he too took that path. When he got to Thatta, he fell in with a Hindu boy. He was so lost in that he forgot his own self but became completely oblivious to his too! The historians are divided as to the exact location of this incident. Ali Quli Khan Daghistani places this incident in Surat. Azad Bilgrami has said that it took place in Azimabad, Patna. Sher Khan Lodhi writes, “In the town of Thatta for , he fell ardently in with a Hindu boy”

This ardent [‘ishq] caused a visible change in his life. He became unconcerned with matters of . His heart became tired of the world. All thoughts of luxury and relaxation fled from his mind and he roamed around in a state of bewilderment and amazement. After a while clothes too seemed a burden and he removed these as well. Now he roamed around naked.

His entry into

He reached in this state of nakedness. Prince Dara Shikuh was Sufi-orientated and a friend of fakirs. When he discovered that Sarmad had entered he ensured that he became acquainted with the Shaykh very soon. After he got to know the Shaykh closely, he was greatly affected by his spiritual power. He respected the Shaykh very much. Prince Dara Shikuh was one of his admirers. Thus he became to have much influence at court.

A change of

Prince Aurangzeb defeated Dara Shikuh and took the reigns of power into his own hands in lieu of Shah Jahan. Dara Shikuh began to wander from desert to desert and settlement to settlement. This period was a testing one for Dara Shikuh’s sympathisers, supporters and associates. Hazrat Sarmad was one of these too. Some people had fled with Dara Shikuh and those who remained considered themselves in danger. Hazrat Sarmad chose not to leave as he knew that his burial place would be in .

Accusations

The accusations which were made upon him were not free from political machinations. The first accusation was that he had apparently rejected the Prophet’s (Allah bless him and give him ) physical Ascension [mi’raj] in the following quatrain:

Every man who is aware of his secret

He becomes concealed even from the skies

The mullah says that Ahmad went to the heavens

Sarmad says that the heavens were inside Ahmad!

The second accusation made upon him was that he was a sympathiser and well-wisher of Dara Shikuh. The third was that he was always nude which is against the teachings of the Shar’iah. The fourth accusation was that he did not read the full kalimah and only recited the words, “There is no ”.

His replies

Aurangzeb sent the Chief Mullah Qavi to Hazrat Sarmad to question him about why he remained naked. When Mullah Qavi asked him the reason as to why he remained naked he recited the following quatrain:

He is happy on account of my humble self

Evil eye and wine is stolen from my hands

He is in my bosom; search for Him in me!

Tis strange that a thief has caused me to be naked!

He was summoned before the court. In this gathering there were the greatest scholars and divines present too in addition to Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb asked him, “People say that you gave Dara Shikuh the good news of the sultanate. Is this true?” Hazrat Sarmad replied, “Yes it is true; and that good news was truthful for he has attained the crown of the eternal sultanate.” The scholars asked him, “Why do you roam around naked?” He gave the same reply which he had given earlier to Mullah Qavi. The scholars asked him to put on some clothes but he ignored them. Aurangzeb addressed the scholars and said, “Being naked in itself is not a reason to kill someone. Ask him to recite the first kalimah.” Sarmad was asked to recite the kalimah. As per his habit he only recited, “There is no ”. When the scholars heard these words of negation they were extremely annoyed. He replied, “Presently, I am drowned [mustaghraq] in Negation ; I have not yet reached the (spiritual) station of Affirmation yet. If I read the full kalimah in this state, I will be telling a lie.” The scholars decided that this action of his was blasphemy [kufr] and that repentance was necessary. Hazrat Sarmad refused to repent. The scholars decided that the penalty was permissible in this case.

The next day he was taken to the execution spot. When the executioner came near to him with a gleaming sword in his hand, he smiled on seeing him and then lifting his eyes to the heavens spoke these historic words:

“May I be sacrificed for you! Come, come, for whichever guise You come in, I recognise You!” Then he recited this distich:

There was a commotion and I opened my eyes from the dream of Non-Existence

I saw that the night of sedition still remained, and so went back to sleep!

After reading this verse he presented his neck and drank from the goblet of martyrdom. His martyrdom occurred in the year 1070 A.H.

His shrine is beneath the Jamia Masjid in and a fount of blessings and grace.

Hazrat Sarmad was a perfect intoxicated [majzub] saint. He had no equal in his Islamic knowledge and virtues. Many people were his followers and disciples. His letters, which are known by the title, “Ruqa’at e Sarmad” [Epistles of Sarmad] are a testimony to his knowledge. He also wrote many quatrains [rubai] in Persian and these are famous as Rubaiyyaat e Sarmad (Quatrains of Sarmad). These have been published. Two of his most famous quatrains are given below and are a representation of his thought and ideas:

O’ Sarmad the pain of is not given to slaves of their desires

The burning of the moth’s heart is not given to the honey-bee!

A whole lifetime is required to obtain Union with the Friend

This treasure, Sarmad, is not given to one and all!

***

I have been honoured with the office of

I have been made oblivious to asking from creatures

Like a candle have I been melted in this world

Due to my burning have I been made a confidante!

Miracles

After his martyrdom the words, ”There is no but Allah” were heard from his mouth thrice. Not only did his severed head recite the kalimah but it continued to praise Allah Almighty for some time afterwards. Aurangzeb ruled for nearly 48 years after Hazrat Sarmad’s martyrdom but never achieved and tranquillity. He spent a long time fighting in the Deccan and finally died there.


Sheikh Bedreddin of Simawna - Another sufi killed by the authorities in 15th century ottoman

Sheikh Bedreddin


Sheikh Badraldin (1359–1420) (Ottoman Turkish: شیخ بدرالدین) was a famous muslim Sufi theologian and charismatic preacher who led a rebellion against the Ottoman Empire in 1416. His full name was Sheikh Badraldin Mahmoud Ben Israel Ben Abdulaziz.

[edit] Early life and education

He was a son of the local muslim judge and his converted Greek wife[1] in the Anatolian city of Simav or in the European Simavna (today Kyprinos in Greece), Badraldin's father (whose name was Israel) was the great-great son of the Seljuk Sultan of Rum Kaykaus II and Kadı of the town. His mother was Malak Hatun. Badradin began his education in this town. Later he went to Bursa and then to Cairo, where he heard lectures on astronomy, mathematics, logic, and philosophy. He studied law and other Islamic subjects. While in Cairo, he was tutor to the son of the Mamluk Berkuk, the first sultan of the Burji dynasty. He married Jazeba Hatun, a Mamluk princess.

[edit] Career

Amid the dynastic struggles following the Battle of Ankara and the death of Sultan Bayezid I, Musa Çelebi appointed Badraldin chief military judge (قاضی عسکر kazasker). When in 1413 Musa's brother and chief rival Mehmet Çelebi became sultan, Badraldin was exiled to Iznik.

[edit] Revolt and death

In 1416 he led the revolt against the sultan in the Aegean coastal region of Anatolia. The main uprising theme of Badraldin and his companions (Torlak Kemal and Börklüce Mustafa) was to share the land equally among people of Karaburun and not to pay the high taxes demanded by the local representatives of the central Ottoman government. Börklüce Mustafa, after a series of initial victories on the troops of the sultan, had to withdraw on the Karaburun Peninsula with 10,000 of his men. A final battle took place in the Valley of the Torment (located between Balıklıova village and Gerence bay) on the Karaburun Peninsula , where all his men were slaughtered. Börklüce Mustafa was crucified while Sheikh Badraldin was taken to the city of Serez where he was hung. This was the end of a remarkable uprising.

After the revolt was put down, Badraldin was hanged in 1420 at Serez and buried there. In 1961 Sheikh Badraldin's remains were transferred from Greece to the mausoleum of Sultan Mahmud in Divanyolu, Istanbul and the date mentioned on the tomb is 1418 or 820 A.H.

[edit] Books and writings

His writings were condemned by a number of Ottoman official religious scholars such as Kadızade. Others instead praise the Sheikh. His writings and especially activist understanding of justice against some local governors was interpreted by as a proto-socialist movement. Then he has been introduced as a popular figure coming from the past among Turkey's left-wing politics who were trying to nationalize their political opinions. Nazim Hikmet was jailed for inciting rebellion after encouraging military cadets to read Badraldin's work. The musicians Cem Karaca and Zülfü Livaneli composed a song based on a Hikmet's epic poem, the Odyssey of Sheikh Badraldin. In Hikmet's work, Badraldin and his companions were considered like socialist rebellions who emphasize that all things must be shared "except the lips of the beloved." Whereas, Badraldin was writing in his famous book "Varidat" that all things belonged to Allah and people will get close to Allah as much as they get free of them. Many famous Sufis such as Niyazi Misri and Muhammed Nur, who are named as the founders of Malamatiyya, wrote some books and praised Badraldin as the 2nd biggest Sufi after Ibn-i Arabi.


[edit] Books on Sheikh Badraldin in Turkish

  • Cemil Yener : Varidat, İstanbul : Elif Yayınları, 1970.
  • Vecihi Timuroğlu : Şeyh Bedrettin Varidat Ankara : Türkiye Yazıları Yayınları, 1979
  • İsmet Zeki Eyüboğlu : Şeyh Bedreddin Varidat, Derin Yayınları, 1980
  • Cengiz Ketene: Varidat: Simavna Kadısıoğlu Şeyh Bedreddin Simavi, 823/1420 ; trc. Cengiz Ketene, Ankara : Kültür Bakanlığı, 1990.
  • Seyyid Muhammed Nur : Varidat şerhi . Simavna Kadısıoğlu Şeyh Bedreddin Simavi, 823/1420 ; Haz. Mahmut Sadettin Bilginer, H. Mustafa Varlı, İstanbul : Esma Yayınları, 1994
  • Michel Balivet : Şeyh Bedreddin Tasavvuf ve İsyan Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 2000.
  • Radi Fiş: Ben De Halimce Bedreddinem Evrensel Basım Yayın.
  • Nazım Hikmet: Şeyh Bedrettin Destanı YKY.
  • Mine G. Kirikkanat, Gulun Oteki Adi (The Other Name Of The Rose)

[edit] References