Regards, Walid.
Regards, Walid.
Ah! Just as Gabriel, Michael and the other angels heard in the realm of hiddenness "Bow to Adam!", in the hiddenness of the world of hiddenness and contemplation, He spoke again (to Iblis) "Do not bow to another than Me". In public He says "Bow to Adam" and in secret, He asked "Oh Iblis, reply, 'Will I bow to whom you have created from clay !?', whispered the divine will in the heart of Iblis "
And so the wretched fellow, in accord with what he was ordered in secret, said "I will not bow to whom you have created from clay". He replied "My curse is upon you !" Iblis answered "Since the robe of honor comes from You whether it brings curse or mercy no matter".
“Men in Egypt, in the gulf, they always want to have sex in the wrong place,” one Egyptian woman whispered to the writer Shereen El Feki, while she conducted her research into sexual proclivities in a rapidly changing Arab world.
The comment was about anatomy, not geography. And it’s indicative of the frankness Ms. El Feki’s “Sex and the Citadel” sometimes achieves. Though she warns her readers that she is not writing an encyclopedia or staging a peep show, Ms. El Feki does ask an array of highly personal questions about present-day sexual relations in Muslim societies, with particular emphasis on Egypt, Tunisia, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates and Morocco. A number of people tell her that anal sex gains appeal when a culture places a high premium on virgin brides.
Ms. El Feki, who is of both Welsh and Egyptian descent, became drawn to her book’s subject matter while serving as vice chairwoman of the United Nations’ Global Commission on H.I.V. and the Law. She was knowledgeable and curious about sexuality, but how hard would she rock the casbah? “Sex and the Citadel” is as much a work of ill-supported optimism as it is an exposé, with a political context that does not extend far beyond the Arab Spring of 2011. So Egypt’s current turmoil and potentially repressive climate go unmentioned. And in a book that frequently invokes the Mubarak administration, she does not mention either President Mohamed Morsi or any improvements his rule might bring.
Of course it’s all relative: Ms. El Feki begins this book taking a long view. She contrasts the avidly sensual Egypt of past centuries with the Arab world’s view of a prim and joyless West. Gustave Flaubert, when not writing “Madame Bovary,” found time for a 19th-century version of sexual tourism in Egypt and described it enthusiastically. (About one of his consorts: “She is very corrupt, writhing, full of pleasure, a little tigress. I stain the divan.”) He voiced disappointment that no worthwhile opportunities for sodomy allowed him to broaden his research.
Flaubert had been drawn by a rich tradition of Middle Eastern erotica that has all but vanished under present-day Islamic strictures. The arrival of Napoleon’s European influence and, later, the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1920s helped this change. Ms. El Feki cites the remarkable fact that some of today’s Egyptian women barely know the Arabic words for female genitalia, since the subject is considered too shameful to discuss. Yet Egypt also treats female circumcision as a commonplace, and Ms. El Feki quotes a mother who says casually, “I’m having my daughters done next week.” Though “Sex and the Citadel” works well enough as a general survey, it lacks the thoughtfulness to reconcile all the contradictory sexual attitudes it describes.
Ms. El Feki finds a daya, “an untraditional traditional midwife,” who performs these circumcisions and also justifies them. The gist of the daya’s argument: Circumcised women are less apt to make nuisances of themselves than intact ones. “What is the case if her husband died or divorced her, is she going to pull men from the cafes?” the daya asks. The world of “Sex and the Citadel” is full of such unanswerable questions.
The rules governing marriage in Islamic countries seem to give great advantages to men. A man can strike up a temporary marriage with a woman with whom he wants to have sex, then say, “I divorce you!” three times and have it be all over. There are several other gradations of marriage that rank beneath the most estimable version: state-recognized, religiously sanctified, family-approved unions. Yet the Egypt that this book describes is anything but a stud’s paradise. When economic hardship is coupled with increasing importance of women in the workplace, male anxieties rise. “Being a man is a privilege, but it’s also a terrific pressure,” one man tells Ms. El Feki. She concludes, “Whatever the reason, the upshot is men with their tackle in a twist.”
“Sex and the Citadel” is not above cheap tricks. The author begins her introduction by showing a vibrator to six baffled Cairo housewives. And the title comes from Ms. El Feki’s claim that a taxi driver told her to strip, even though she merely asked to be taken to the Saladin Citadel in Cairo; she says that the Citadel’s Arabic name sounds like the Egyptian word for undressing.
But her survey covers major sex-related subjects, like being unmarried in an Arab country (“It’s almost inconceivable to bring home a date unless it’s of the edible variety”), trying to persuade a condom-averse population to practice protected sex, the ubiquitousness of prostitution and the treatment of homosexuals. Every single aspect of the book is influenced by the new pervasiveness of Western pornography and the impossibility of shrouding sex in secrecy anymore.
Most of her book is general. But Ms. El Feki does come across some memorable specifics, like the restored-virginity racket. Chinese efforts to market fake hymens filled with red dye touched off a 2009 debate in Egypt’s Parliament and became one more blot on the Mubarak government’s record. And an ethical dilemma faces doctors asked to do surgical hymen repair. “Are they complicit in a procedure that buttresses the patriarchy and the double standards around virginity?” Ms. El Feki asks.
As one Cairo doctor puts it: “When I have 10 women who appear for a consultation, I sympathize with at least 9 of them. They’re suffering, and I am of a mind to help these girls.”
Satan and mystics
http://www.frontline.in/static/html/fl2909/stories/20120518290907800.htm
|
|||||
BOOKS
Satan and mystics
A.G. NOORANI
FOR centuries, the motif of Iblis (Satan) as a figure to be admired, rather than despised, has continued in Sufi lore and Islamic literature. Of course, Iblis also retained his place in religious belief as the damned one. The lay Muslim and the ulema point to the Quranic verses which describe the fall of Satan from the exalted position he once occupied as Azazil, the archangel, and Satan's confrontation with Adam and Eve leading to their expulsion from heaven. The Sufi resents any suggestion that his faith in the Quran is weaker than that of the maulvi. But he reads the text differently. God formed Adam from clay and breathed into him His spirit. He ordered the angels to bow before this unique creation made of clay but with the divine spark within. All obeyed, except Iblis. He argued: “I would never prostrate myself before a mortal whom Thou has created out of clay and mould. I am better than he: Thou created me of fire and, him Thou created of clay.” Satan is banished from Paradise for his defiance, and a divine curse rests in him until Judgment Day. But he is given a respite until then so that he can tempt and test man. The fall of the angel preceded the fall of man. Adam and Eve were asked to live in the garden where God provided for them in abundance. He denied them the produce of only one tree. Iblis tempted them to eat just that. They lost their innocence and were driven to an earthly existence carrying with them the seeds of human aggression and fratricide. Iblis was sworn to serve as the enemy of man. The Quranic account bears a close resemblance to that in the Bible. Dr Peter J. Awn of the Department of Religion in Columbia University was the first to explore the theme with a wealth of learning in his work Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblis in Sufi Psychology (E.J. Brill, Leiden, 1983). Whitney S. Bodman, Associate Professor of Comparative Religion, Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary, discusses his work and proceeds to make his own fascinating exploration of the Quranic verses, the classic Commentaries, the writings of old mystics and modern writings including those of the poet-philosopher Iqbal. The diversity of interpretations of Iblis in modern works, he holds, “is foreshadowed in the diversity of the Quranic story itself. The Quran does not tell a simple story of Iblis but weaves a complex and suggestive narrative that allows for a range of diverse and divergent interpretations. Muslims through the ages have found within that range the opportunity to explore various nuances of the age-old issue of theodicy. The Quran indeed not only allows this exploration but also invites and encourages it.” The mathnawis of Fariduddin Attar and Jalaluddin Rumi, one of the greatest mystic poets of all time, are rich in allusions to Iblis. In his devotion, Iblis can still hope for God's mercy. Attar wrote: “My heart was filled with His glory;/ I was a confessor of His unity./ Nevertheless, without cause, in spite of all this devotion,/ He drove me from His threshold without warning/… Since without cause I was driven away by Him,/ I can also, without cause, be called back by Him./ Since in God's actions there is no how and why, it is not right to abandon hope in God./ … Since, without cause, You bestowed the gift of existence,/ In the same way, without cause, drown me in Your generosity.” In the Quran, God assures man that He is “closer to you than your jugular vein.” But He warns also that “truly Satan flows in man's very bloodstream”. He thrives on man's nafs, the lower soul, which leads him astray. Satan's fate illustrates the results of pride and intellectual conceit. He revelled in logic, little realising its limitations. “He did not realise that one who bowed to Adam in accordance with God's command was truly bowing to God himself.” Rumi's lines on this failing reflect the Sufi disdain for the intellect as the sole guide in the spiritual progress of man: “He possessed intellect, but since he possessed not the passionate yearning of faith, He saw in Adam only a clay form. Even if you possess the fine points of knowledge, O worthy fellow, that will not open your two eyes to pierce the unseen.” But, it is to Mansur Al-Hallaj, who went to the gallows declaiming that he was the Truth (God), that one must turn to discover the first elaborations of the complex tragedy surrounding the personality of lblis. For Mansur, lblis is a tragic victim. Condemned he was, but perfect in his devotion to God and preferred self-destruction to a compromise with his faith. To man, lblis is teacher no less than tempter. Mansur devotes a whole chapter in his Tawasin to lblis. “There was no monotheist like lblis among the inhabitants of the heavens. When the essence revealed itself to him in stunning glory, he renounced even a glance at it and worshipped God in ascetic isolation…. God said to him, ‘Bow.' He replied, ‘To no other.' He said to him, ‘Even if my curse be upon you?' He cried out, ‘To no other.'” A few centuries later, Sarmad spoke in the same vein. He was a Jewish convert to Sufism who met the same fate as Mansur. Aurangzeb ordered him to be beheaded on the steps of Jama Masjid, Delhi, where his tomb is. Sarmad wrote in one of his quatrains: “Go, learn the method of servantship from Satan: Choose one qibla and do not prostrate yourself before anything.” Satan emerges as a strikingly colourful, almost attractive, figure in Iqbal's Javid-Namah. In another poem, Iqbal has Gabriel and Iblis exchanging taunts and reproaches. Gabriel tells Iblis: “You lost the loftiest position by your denial. What prestige can angels now enjoy in the eyes of the Almighty?” Iblis retorts what a daring and stormy life he leads on earth in contrast to Gabriel's uneventful existence in heaven. The concluding lines read: “If ever you find yourself alone with God, ask Him: Who has coloured the story of Adam with his own blood? I prick the conscience of the Almighty like a thorn. You can only declaim, Oh God! Oh God!” It is an erudite and fascinating book. Its author's summing up is perfect. “The burdens of discernment and the power of desire, even desire for God, lead mortals into a wilderness of God's own design. Although will and righteousness direct us towards the final destination, that same will and righteousness also lead us astray. Like al-Hallaj's Iblis, we cannot assume that God's command, often interpreted through human medium and contextualised in time and space, with God's will, which is eternal, are the same. The very recognition that there is a difference is the fertile soil of tragedy. We choose, discern, reason, decide, and suffer the consequences, trusting in God's mercy. While it is tempting, in the human search for the straight path, to dismiss tragedy as a failure of faith in God's good mercy, in fact, it is in the tragic that we recognise that the straight path is not well lit. We choose, and suffer the consequences. That is the path.” |
Dear participants,
I have performed a duplicate migration of "dirassat" content to dirassat.wordpress.com in addition to dirassat.posthaven.com.
I will be evaluating both services and finalizing one shortly. It all depends on the speed with which Posthaven can ramp up their functionality from the existing beta release.
You are invited to send me your input to my email at walid@dirassat.org.
I am planning a final migration to "dirassat.org" address using Wordpress or Posthaven blogging services. A joined administration of the blogging is needed for the continuity of the blogging services for future generations.
Today is the final day for dirassat.posterous.com before the service shuts down on midnight.
I bid you all farewell and a successful new reincarnation in the new platform.
Dirassat Posterous Died ... Long Live Dirassat ...
Regards,
Walid.
Testing my first posting